<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nopurpose.org &#187; kate winslet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/tag/kate-winslet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog</link>
	<description>Caught In The Whirlwind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscars: A Review</title>
		<link>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hugh jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall-e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derango.wordpress.com/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night was The Oscars, and as has become a tradition for me I watched it with Wassy and Jay this year again. The new part was that instead of watching it long distance as per usual, I went over to their place and watched it with them, along with a bloomin onion from Outback


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/12/11/movies-and-art/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Movies And Art'>Movies And Art</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/02/26/of-binoculars-and-periscopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Of Binoculars and Periscopes'>Of Binoculars and Periscopes</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Reader And Hanging Out'>The Reader And Hanging Out</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Last night was The Oscars, and as has become a tradition for<br />
me I watched it with <span class="editor-misspelled">Wassy</span> and Jay this year<br />
again. The new part was that instead of watching it long distance as per usual,<br />
I went over to their place and watched it with them, along with a <span class="editor-misspelled">bloomin</span> onion<br />
from Outback and a couple glasses of wine. It was a very enjoyable evening.
</p>
<p>There was a little bit of worry involved in this year&#39;s ceremony since it was<br />
revealed they would be a little bit different than they had been in the past.<br />
Which was good because there&#39;s a ton of fluff built into the ceremony which<br />
caused them to play off the winners very quickly and still run over time. But<br />
it&#39;s scary because they could have screwed it up.</p>
<p>Another scary thing was the selection of Hugh Jackman as the host. I saw that<br />
and thought &quot;What the hell???&quot; but as it turned out, it was a VERY<br />
good decision. His opening number was..incredible. I&#39;m trying so very hard to<br />
find a copy of that somewhere and not being successful at it. We were<br />
practically rolling on the floor laughing.</p>
<p>The actual changes to the ceremony were very positive. They got rid of a lot of<br />
the overly pretentious montages that the oscars have become known for, instead<br />
keeping them limited to shorter pieces highlighting the films of the year. Another<br />
winning idea was to not let the Academy president or the MPAA guy or whoever<br />
talk. It&#39;s always boring and it always takes FOREVER. Also in the positive<br />
changes department: each original song nominee was played in a medley and they<br />
combined the song from Wall-E and one of the Slumdog Millionaire songs in a<br />
very neat way</p>
<p>They also redid how they talked about the best actress/actor nominees by<br />
bringing out former winners and spending time talking about each nominee and<br />
what they did with their role. It was very classy and really celebrated the<br />
performances that were nominated. Very inclusive. </p>
<p>The one thing I could have done without was the performance number about the<br />
Musicals. It was very schmaltzy and a couple minutes too long&#8230;but if that was<br />
the worst of it, I&#39;m a happy camper. the ordering of the awards was very<br />
strange too. They stuck best supporting actress up front and then a bunch of<br />
other stuff and best supporting actor about an hour and a half in.</p>
<p>As far as the actual awards&#8230;I&#39;m glad Slumdog didn&#39;t sweep entirely. It was<br />
getting a little boring knowing they were going to win as soon as their name<br />
was called for being nominated. I&#39;m a little disappointed at Wall-E not winning<br />
best original screenplay as I really think it was well written, especially<br />
challenging for a movie with so little dialog and characters that, by<br />
definition, have a difficult time expressing emotions via expression. So much<br />
of the movie was in the writing. No surprise they won the animated feature<br />
award though. I like Jack Black&#39;s statement as he was presenting on how he<br />
makes more money on his voice work than his live action stuff because he stars<br />
in a single Dreamworks movie and then takes the money he gets from that and<br />
bets it all on Pixar to win an Oscar. Complete with a&#160; &quot;Yeah!!!&quot;<br />
cheer when Wall-E was announced as the winner.</p>
<p>I&#39;m very glad Kate Winslet won an oscar for her performance in The Reader. I<br />
sorta think Revolutionary Road was a hair better but she was so very good in<br />
both of them so I&#39;m glad she got an award for something. I liked her acceptance<br />
speech too&#8230;she strikes me as a very genuine individual.</p>
<p>I&#39;m also really glad that Heath Ledger won for his portrayal of The Joker. I<br />
was afraid that the fact that he had died would dissuade people from voting for<br />
him, but his performance was more deserving than anything else in the<br />
supporting actor category by far. I think they should have showed a little clip<br />
of his performance after he won, like on the Golden Globes, but it was a really<br />
cool moment. Of course now we need to deal with people saying &quot;He wouldn&#39;t<br />
have won if he was alive&quot; which is absolute bull.</p>
<p>So in conclusion, good ceremony this year, and a good Oscar-watching party to<br />
watch it at.</p>
<p style="clear:both;">
<p>    <a href="http://frosty.vox.com/library/post/the-oscars-a-review.html?_c=feed-atom-full#comments">Read and post comments</a></p>
<p> |</p>
<p>    <a href="http://www.vox.com/share/6a00c2252137ea8fdb0110180acae0860f?_c=feed-atom-full">Send to a friend</a></p>
</p></div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/12/11/movies-and-art/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Movies And Art'>Movies And Art</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/02/26/of-binoculars-and-periscopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Of Binoculars and Periscopes'>Of Binoculars and Periscopes</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Reader And Hanging Out'>The Reader And Hanging Out</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Reader And Hanging Out</title>
		<link>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 19:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derango.wordpress.com/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reader [Theatrical Release] This weekend continues the second week of trying to catch all of these good movies that seem to be coming out in January. This week: The Reader. Originally we were going to go see Slumdog Millionaire, however The Reader opened at our local theater, so we decided to go out and


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/01/22/ultra-hanging-out/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Ultra Hanging Out'>Ultra Hanging Out</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2006/09/26/the-mpaa-just-doesnt-get-it/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The MPAA just doesn&#8217;t get it&#8230;'>The MPAA just doesn&#8217;t get it&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/17/long-weekend-wrapup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Long Weekend Wrapup'>Long Weekend Wrapup</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div class="enclosure enclosure-right enclosure-large video-enclosure" style="text-align:center;float:right;">
<div class="enclosure-inner" style="border:1px solid;width:px;margin:0 0 20px 20px;padding:9px;">
<div class="enclosure-list">
<div class="enclosure-item video-asset last">
<div class="enclosure-image">
<p>                <a href="http://frosty.vox.com/library/video/6a00c2252137ea8fdb0110162c6c51860c.html"><img src="http://derango.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/6a00c2252137ea8fdb0110162c6c51860c.jpg?w=202" alt="The Reader [Theatrical Release]" title="The Reader [Theatrical Release]" /></a></p></div>
<div class="enclosure-meta">
<div class="enclosure-asset-name"><a href="http://frosty.vox.com/library/video/6a00c2252137ea8fdb0110162c6c51860c.html" title="The Reader [Theatrical Release]">The Reader [Theatrical Release]</a></div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
</p></div>
</div>
</div>
<p><!-- end enclosure --></p>
<p>
This weekend continues the second week of trying to catch all of these good movies that seem to be coming out in January. This week: <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0976051/">The Reader</a>. Originally we were going to go see <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1010048/">Slumdog Millionaire</a>, however The Reader opened at our local theater, so we decided to go out and watch it instead.</p>
<p>Overall I&#39;d say The Reader was a very good film, but I think I liked Revolutionary Road just a hair better considering it was more personally relevant and I could identify with the characters more. But The Reader was very good. The pacing is a little slow, but necessarily slow. I was getting a little worried while I was going through the first part of it, however that part of the story is important to what happens in the second half and as such, it all came together. I can see why some of the reviewers did not enjoy it though.</p>
<p>I don&#39;t want to say much about the plot because that&#39;s the whole emphisis in a movie like this. I will say this is the second week in a row where we ended up watching a very dark and depressing sort of movie. Definitely not a feel good sort of film. </p>
<p>Kate Winslet&#39;s performance is definitely deserving of the awards she&#39;s nominated for. It was really the pin that held the movie together. It&#39;s one of those movies where you need to think about it and get into the characters heads in order to understand what&#39;s really going on but it was really well done all around.</p>
<p>The only downside is, like <a href="http://frosty.vox.com/library/post/revolutionary-road.html">last week</a>&#8230;we had old people problems. A couple sitting next to us wouldn&#39;t shut up and kept having conversations about what was going on in the movie, which during a quieter, dialog driven movie is INCREDIBLY annoying and distracted. It got bad enough to the point where I ended up actually staring at them and saying something so they would be quiet. I don&#39;t really mind if you&#39;re going to say a few words her and there or make a few comments, but don&#39;t freaking have long conversations in the middle of important dialog sequences!!!!</p>
<p>After the movie, I went back to my friends apartment and we hung out for a while, watching season 1 of House and getting some work done. I worked some on my C++ learning efforts and Wassy had to get one of her commission pieces finished. So it was a productive working fun day which was very nice after a long and draining sort of week. </p>
<p style="clear:both;">
    <a href="http://frosty.vox.com/library/post/the-reader-and-hanging-out.html?_c=feed-atom-full#comments">Read and post comments</a>   |<br />
    <a href="http://www.vox.com/share/6a00c2252137ea8fdb011015e79eb5860b?_c=feed-atom-full">Send to a friend</a>
</p>
</p></div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/01/22/ultra-hanging-out/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Ultra Hanging Out'>Ultra Hanging Out</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2006/09/26/the-mpaa-just-doesnt-get-it/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The MPAA just doesn&#8217;t get it&#8230;'>The MPAA just doesn&#8217;t get it&#8230;</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/17/long-weekend-wrapup/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Long Weekend Wrapup'>Long Weekend Wrapup</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

