<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nopurpose.org &#187; hugh jackman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/tag/hugh-jackman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog</link>
	<description>Caught In The Whirlwind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 16:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Oscars: A Review</title>
		<link>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heath ledger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hugh jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kate winslet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wall-e]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://derango.wordpress.com/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night was The Oscars, and as has become a tradition for me I watched it with Wassy and Jay this year again. The new part was that instead of watching it long distance as per usual, I went over to their place and watched it with them, along with a bloomin onion from Outback


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/12/11/movies-and-art/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Movies And Art'>Movies And Art</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/02/26/of-binoculars-and-periscopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Of Binoculars and Periscopes'>Of Binoculars and Periscopes</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Reader And Hanging Out'>The Reader And Hanging Out</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Last night was The Oscars, and as has become a tradition for<br />
me I watched it with <span class="editor-misspelled">Wassy</span> and Jay this year<br />
again. The new part was that instead of watching it long distance as per usual,<br />
I went over to their place and watched it with them, along with a <span class="editor-misspelled">bloomin</span> onion<br />
from Outback and a couple glasses of wine. It was a very enjoyable evening.
</p>
<p>There was a little bit of worry involved in this year&#39;s ceremony since it was<br />
revealed they would be a little bit different than they had been in the past.<br />
Which was good because there&#39;s a ton of fluff built into the ceremony which<br />
caused them to play off the winners very quickly and still run over time. But<br />
it&#39;s scary because they could have screwed it up.</p>
<p>Another scary thing was the selection of Hugh Jackman as the host. I saw that<br />
and thought &quot;What the hell???&quot; but as it turned out, it was a VERY<br />
good decision. His opening number was..incredible. I&#39;m trying so very hard to<br />
find a copy of that somewhere and not being successful at it. We were<br />
practically rolling on the floor laughing.</p>
<p>The actual changes to the ceremony were very positive. They got rid of a lot of<br />
the overly pretentious montages that the oscars have become known for, instead<br />
keeping them limited to shorter pieces highlighting the films of the year. Another<br />
winning idea was to not let the Academy president or the MPAA guy or whoever<br />
talk. It&#39;s always boring and it always takes FOREVER. Also in the positive<br />
changes department: each original song nominee was played in a medley and they<br />
combined the song from Wall-E and one of the Slumdog Millionaire songs in a<br />
very neat way</p>
<p>They also redid how they talked about the best actress/actor nominees by<br />
bringing out former winners and spending time talking about each nominee and<br />
what they did with their role. It was very classy and really celebrated the<br />
performances that were nominated. Very inclusive. </p>
<p>The one thing I could have done without was the performance number about the<br />
Musicals. It was very schmaltzy and a couple minutes too long&#8230;but if that was<br />
the worst of it, I&#39;m a happy camper. the ordering of the awards was very<br />
strange too. They stuck best supporting actress up front and then a bunch of<br />
other stuff and best supporting actor about an hour and a half in.</p>
<p>As far as the actual awards&#8230;I&#39;m glad Slumdog didn&#39;t sweep entirely. It was<br />
getting a little boring knowing they were going to win as soon as their name<br />
was called for being nominated. I&#39;m a little disappointed at Wall-E not winning<br />
best original screenplay as I really think it was well written, especially<br />
challenging for a movie with so little dialog and characters that, by<br />
definition, have a difficult time expressing emotions via expression. So much<br />
of the movie was in the writing. No surprise they won the animated feature<br />
award though. I like Jack Black&#39;s statement as he was presenting on how he<br />
makes more money on his voice work than his live action stuff because he stars<br />
in a single Dreamworks movie and then takes the money he gets from that and<br />
bets it all on Pixar to win an Oscar. Complete with a&#160; &quot;Yeah!!!&quot;<br />
cheer when Wall-E was announced as the winner.</p>
<p>I&#39;m very glad Kate Winslet won an oscar for her performance in The Reader. I<br />
sorta think Revolutionary Road was a hair better but she was so very good in<br />
both of them so I&#39;m glad she got an award for something. I liked her acceptance<br />
speech too&#8230;she strikes me as a very genuine individual.</p>
<p>I&#39;m also really glad that Heath Ledger won for his portrayal of The Joker. I<br />
was afraid that the fact that he had died would dissuade people from voting for<br />
him, but his performance was more deserving than anything else in the<br />
supporting actor category by far. I think they should have showed a little clip<br />
of his performance after he won, like on the Golden Globes, but it was a really<br />
cool moment. Of course now we need to deal with people saying &quot;He wouldn&#39;t<br />
have won if he was alive&quot; which is absolute bull.</p>
<p>So in conclusion, good ceremony this year, and a good Oscar-watching party to<br />
watch it at.</p>
<p style="clear:both;">
<p>    <a href="http://frosty.vox.com/library/post/the-oscars-a-review.html?_c=feed-atom-full#comments">Read and post comments</a></p>
<p> |</p>
<p>    <a href="http://www.vox.com/share/6a00c2252137ea8fdb0110180acae0860f?_c=feed-atom-full">Send to a friend</a></p>
</p></div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/12/11/movies-and-art/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Movies And Art'>Movies And Art</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2008/02/26/of-binoculars-and-periscopes/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Of Binoculars and Periscopes'>Of Binoculars and Periscopes</a></li>
<li><a href='http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/08/the-reader-and-hanging-out/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: The Reader And Hanging Out'>The Reader And Hanging Out</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nopurpose.org/blog/2009/02/23/the-oscars-a-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

